How ERCs Are Structured
Fixed-rate products come with an ERC schedule, usually expressed as a percentage of the outstanding balance that tapers through the fixed period. A typical 5-year fix might have 5% in year 1, 4% in year 2, 3% in year 3, 2% in year 4, 1% in year 5. A 2-year fix might be 3% in year 1 and 2% in year 2. Check your mortgage offer document or latest annual statement for the exact schedule on your current product.
The ERC applies to the balance at the date of redemption, not the original loan. As you have paid down capital over the years, the ERC base shrinks. On a £200,000 original loan now at £170,000 balance with a 3% ERC, the penalty is £5,100 not £6,000.
| Product type | Typical ERC year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-year fixed | 3% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 3-year fixed | 3% | 2% | 1% | - | - |
| 5-year fixed | 5% | 4% | 3% | 2% | 1% |
| 10-year fixed | 6% | 6% | 5% | 4% | 3% (then tapers) |
| Tracker (most) | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
The Break-Even Formula
ERC is worth paying if the interest saving over the remaining fixed period exceeds the ERC plus fees of the new product. Interest saving equals (current rate − new rate) × average balance over the remaining period × years remaining. Against this, cost equals ERC + new product fee + legal fees (if not free) + valuation fees (if not free) + your old lender's admin/exit fee.
A slightly more precise method: compute the total amount paid (principal + interest + fees) under scenario A (stay until end of fixed, then refinance) versus scenario B (pay ERC now, refinance immediately). If B is lower, the ERC is worth paying. For short remaining periods (under 9 months) the difference rarely exceeds the ERC, so staying is usually right.
The FOS has upheld complaints where advisers recommended ERC-triggering switches without documenting a break-even analysis. Under Consumer Duty rules, regulated advisers should run and evidence the comparison before advising a switch that incurs an ERC.
Worked Example 1: Large Rate Gap, Small Balance
Rachel took a 5-year fixed at 5.24% in June 2023 on a £95,000 balance (Cumberland BS, 85% LTV at the time). It is now April 2026, so she is in year 3 with a 3% ERC on the current £87,000 balance = £2,610. A new 2-year fix at 4.30% (65% LTV, because her property has risen to £185,000 giving 47% LTV) is available with a £999 fee.
Interest saved over remaining 27 months: (5.24% − 4.30%) × average balance roughly £82,000 × 2.25 years = £1,733. Cost: ERC £2,610 + fee £999 = £3,609. Interest saving does not cover the ERC and fee. Rachel should stay until year 5, then refinance normally.
But: if Rachel had been in year 2 with a 4% ERC of £3,480 on £87,000, and with 36 months remaining instead of 27, the interest saving would be (5.24% − 4.30%) × £80,000 × 3 = £2,256, still short of £4,479 cost. The earlier in the fix, the more years of saving you capture, but the larger the ERC. Break-even for most 5-year fixes falls at around year 3 to 4 when rate gaps are 0.75% to 1.0%.
Worked Example 2: Large Balance, Small Rate Gap
David has a £540,000 balance on a 5-year fix at 4.85% taken in April 2023, so in year 3 with 2% remaining ERC on current balance of £498,000 = £9,960. A new 4.10% 5-year fix is available with a £1,999 fee.
Option A: stay 24 months then refinance. Interest at 4.85% on average £480,000 over 2 years = £46,560. Option B: pay ERC now, refinance to 4.10% 5-year. Interest at 4.10% on average £480,000 over 2 years = £39,360. Interest saved: £7,200. Cost: ERC £9,960 + fee £1,999 = £11,959. Net cost of switching: £4,759.
But over the 5-year period of the new fix, the benefit extends. Years 3-5 of the new product are at 4.10% rather than whatever market rate will be at refinance. If we assume future 5-year rates in 2028 will be around 4.30% (rough consensus), David saves roughly 0.20% × £460,000 × 3 = £2,760 extra. Total 5-year comparison: £4,759 cost − £2,760 future saving = £1,999 net cost. David should stay. This is typical when the rate gap is under 1%.