Why Landlords Remortgage From Foundation Home Loans
Buy-to-let borrowers consider moving away from Foundation Home Loans for several portfolio-driven reasons:
- Specialist rate premium — Foundation's SVR can reach 8.49% to 8.99%, and even their initial fixed rates tend to carry a modest premium over mainstream BTL pricing, reflecting the complexity they accept
- Simplified circumstances — landlords who originally needed Foundation's flexible approach to income verification or credit history may now qualify for cheaper products from mainstream BTL lenders
- Market competition — the specialist BTL space has become increasingly competitive, with lenders like Fleet and Landbay entering areas that were previously the preserve of niche providers
- Rate environment shifts — changes in the base rate and swap rates affect different lenders at different times, creating windows of opportunity where another provider's pricing may be significantly sharper
Foundation remains an excellent option for genuinely complex cases, but landlords should never assume that their best deal at origination remains their best deal at renewal.
Foundation Home Loans BTL Rates and SVR
Foundation Home Loans prices its buy-to-let products to reflect the specialist nature of the cases it accepts. Their initial fixed rates typically sit slightly above mainstream BTL best buys, though they remain competitive within the specialist segment for complex cases involving limited companies, HMOs or borrowers with unusual income.
The SVR, however, carries a more pronounced premium. Foundation's revert rate generally falls between 8.49% and 8.99%. For a landlord with a £160,000 interest-only BTL mortgage held in a limited company, a SVR of 8.74% produces monthly payments of approximately £1,165. Moving to a competitive limited company fix at 5.19% would bring that down to around £692 — a saving of £473 per month or nearly £5,700 per year.
For landlords with multiple Foundation mortgages across a portfolio of complex properties, the cumulative SVR cost can represent a significant proportion of total rental income. Even a reduction of 2% across the portfolio translates into thousands of pounds of additional annual cash flow.