What Is a Restrictive Covenant?
A restrictive covenant is a legally binding obligation that restricts how the owner of a piece of land can use that land. Unlike positive covenants (which require you to do something), restrictive covenants require you to refrain from doing something. They are attached to the land itself, meaning they pass from one owner to the next and remain enforceable regardless of who owns the property.
Restrictive covenants are typically created when land is sold and the seller wants to retain some control over how the land is used after the sale. They are recorded in the property's title deeds and, for registered land, noted on the register at HM Land Registry.
Common examples of restrictive covenants include:
- No business use — The property must only be used as a private dwelling and not for any trade or business purposes.
- No further building — The owner must not erect any additional buildings or structures on the land without consent.
- No alterations to the exterior — The owner must not alter the appearance of the property without approval.
- No subdivision — The property must not be divided into separate dwellings.
- Fencing and boundary restrictions — Requirements about the type and height of fencing or hedging.
- No caravans or mobile homes — The land must not be used for stationing caravans or mobile homes.
- Approved use only — The property must only be used for purposes approved by the original developer or estate owner.
It is worth noting that restrictive covenants are separate from planning permission. Even if you have planning permission to carry out certain works, a restrictive covenant may still prevent you from doing so. Both planning law and covenant law must be satisfied.
How Restrictive Covenants Affect Your Remortgage
When you apply to remortgage, your solicitor will review the property's title as part of the conveyancing process. Any restrictive covenants noted on the title will be examined and reported to the lender. How this affects your remortgage depends on the nature of the covenant and whether it has been complied with.
Covenants that are being complied with
If the restrictive covenant is being fully complied with, it is unlikely to cause any problems with your remortgage. For example, if there is a covenant preventing business use and you are using the property solely as your home, the lender should have no concerns. The covenant simply remains as a condition on the title, and the lender's solicitor will note it in their report.
Covenants that have been breached
If a restrictive covenant has been breached, this is where complications can arise. A breach could occur if, for example, you have built an extension on a property with a covenant preventing additional building without consent. In this case, the lender will be concerned about the risk that the person or body with the benefit of the covenant could seek to enforce it.
Enforcement could potentially involve an injunction requiring the breach to be remedied (such as removing the extension) or a claim for damages. This represents a risk to the lender's security, which is why they take covenant breaches seriously.
Obsolete or unenforceable covenants
Some restrictive covenants may be very old and effectively obsolete, or the person or body who originally benefited from the covenant may no longer exist or be identifiable. In these cases, enforcement is highly unlikely. However, until the covenant is formally removed or modified, it remains on the title, and the lender's solicitor must still consider it.
Lenders' typical approach
Most lenders take a pragmatic approach to restrictive covenants. If the covenant is being complied with, they will generally proceed without issue. If there is a breach, they may accept the situation if indemnity insurance is available and the risk of enforcement is considered low. Some lenders may require the covenant to be formally dealt with before they will proceed.
Dealing With a Covenant Breach
If your property has a restrictive covenant that has been breached, there are several options available to address the situation before or during the remortgage process.
Indemnity insurance
The most common and cost-effective solution is to obtain indemnity insurance. This is a one-off insurance policy that protects the property owner (and the lender) against the financial consequences of the covenant being enforced. The policy covers legal costs and any damages or losses that might arise if enforcement action is taken.
Indemnity insurance is widely available and typically costs between 50 and a few hundred pounds for a one-off premium. Most lenders will accept indemnity insurance as adequate protection against covenant breaches, provided the policy meets their requirements. It is important to note that indemnity insurance does not remove the covenant or make the breach lawful. It simply provides financial protection against the risk of enforcement.
One crucial point about indemnity insurance is that you must not contact the person or body who benefits from the covenant before obtaining the policy. If you draw their attention to the breach, it can invalidate or make it impossible to obtain indemnity insurance.
Obtaining retrospective consent
If the covenant requires consent for certain actions, you may be able to obtain retrospective consent from the person or body who benefits from the covenant. This resolves the breach entirely and removes the issue from a legal perspective. However, this approach carries risks as the beneficiary may refuse consent or demand payment, and once you have drawn their attention to the breach, indemnity insurance may no longer be available.
Applying to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber)
Under Section 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925, you can apply to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) to have a restrictive covenant modified or discharged. The Tribunal can modify or remove a covenant if it is satisfied that certain grounds are met, such as the covenant being obsolete, the proposed use being reasonable, or the covenant not securing any practical benefit for the person entitled to enforce it.
This route provides a definitive legal solution but can be time-consuming and expensive. It is typically reserved for cases where indemnity insurance is not available or where the covenant is causing significant ongoing problems.
Negotiating a deed of release
You can approach the person or body who benefits from the covenant and ask them to agree to a formal deed of release, which removes the covenant from the title. This requires their voluntary agreement and may involve paying a sum of money. As with obtaining retrospective consent, this approach should be considered carefully because it involves disclosing the breach.